For school groups, colleges and training providers

The safeguarding policy changed on Friday. Here is every adult on campus who confirmed it.

A named record of who acknowledged the policy, by campus, including the coaches, aftercare staff and contractors who never had a school email. The accreditation visit gets a file, not a folder.

Everything on this page ships today. Roadmap items are marked and not sold.

Kayden Connect feed for a fictional Western Cape school group. A pinned announcement, Safeguarding and child protection policy 2026, shows 172 of 190 acknowledged with an Acknowledge button.
The same pinned policy on a teacher's phone, with a full-width Acknowledge button and the count 172 of 190.
172 of 190 acknowledgedRemind 18 pending

44%of K-12 workers in the United States say they always or very often feel burned out at work, against 30% of all other workers. The people expected to read, confirm and apply every policy change are the most stretched workforce Gallup measures.Source: Gallup, K-12 Workers Have Highest Burnout Rate in U.S., 13 June 2022. Industry figure, not a Kayden Connect result.

The situation

The policy changed. The staffroom notice cannot say who read it.

A four-campus school group revises its safeguarding policy. The new version goes out by email to teaching staff and is mentioned at Monday's briefing on two campuses. The coaches, the aftercare team and the transport contractor do not have school email. Three weeks later the accreditation visit asks which adults on site were informed of the change, and when. The head has a read-receipt list from one campus and a signed register from another. The group employs 190 people.

Today
  • One email to teaching staff, one briefing on two campuses.
  • Coaches, aftercare and contractors not on the list.
  • The accreditation visit gets a register from one campus.
With the record
  • One announcement, approved, pinned on every campus.
  • 172 confirmed by name and campus; 18 pending, reminded.
  • Every adult on site, email or not, on the record.
How it works

Four screens, all shipped.

1Publish

One policy, approved, pinned on every campus.

The safeguarding lead drafts it. On HQ the approval rule holds it until the group head has signed it off, and the approval is logged. Staff see it pinned on the phone and confirm with one tap before Monday's briefing.

Every plan · approval before publishing on HQChildren's Act
The pinned announcement card: Safeguarding and child protection policy 2026, in force from Monday 7 September, with an Acknowledge button and 172 of 190 acknowledged, 91%.
One tap to confirm
2Record

By campus, by name, with the time.

Stellenbosch 58 of 62. Somerset West 47 of 52. One reminder to the 18 still pending, at most once every four hours, so the teachers who did their part are left alone. The campus that is behind is visible before the visit.

Coverage by department and campus on Command and HQKeeping children safe in education 2026
3Reach

Coaches, aftercare and contractors join with a code and their phone.

The adults on site who never had a school email are the ones the accreditation visit asks about. A campus head issues one single-use code per named person; they enter it with their phone number and are in. 18 joined this month.

Every plan · role-gated, capped per workspace per monthChildren's Act
Frontline access codes: 7 active codes, 18 joined this month, 190 of 200 seats used, 21 of 300 SMS this month, and a table of coaches, aftercare staff and contractors with phone binding and status by campus.
No school email needed
4Require

Turn the reporting procedure into required reading with a due date.

Safeguarding: mandatory reporting and the concern form: 176 complete, 11 not started, 3 never asked because they have no campus set. Late is marked late. When the visit asks, the evidence pack is one click on HQ.

Who has read it: 176 of 190 complete, 11 overdue, Remind all, Export as CSV and Evidence pack buttons, and a named roster by campus with Waiting and Acknowledged late labels.
Required reading on a phone: Safeguarding and child protection policy 2026 due Sep 7, three documents marked Done.
What you must evidence

The people who can ask for the record, in their own words.

South Africa · Children's Act
“who on reasonable grounds concludes that a child has been abused in a manner causing physical injury, sexually abused or deliberately neglected, must report that conclusion in the prescribed form”
Section 110(1), Act 38 of 2005, as amended; teachers are named in the list of persons who must report

What the record gives youThe reporting duty and the concern form reach every adult on site with a named confirmation, by campus and date.

United States · California Education Code, mandated reporter training
“provide proof of completing the training within the first six weeks”
Section 44691(b)(2), of each school year or of employment; annual training under 44691(b)(1)

What the record gives youRequired reading with a due date six weeks into the year, late marked late, and the evidence pack as the proof file for the district.

United Kingdom · Keeping children safe in education 2026
“All staff should be aware of systems within their school or college which support safeguarding, and these should be explained to them as part of staff induction.”
Part one, paragraph 11; training at induction and regularly updated, paragraph 12

What the record gives youThe induction set becomes required reading for every new adult on site, with the confirmation dated. Cited as a widely used standard, not as law outside the UK.

Cited as what a school must be able to show. Kayden Connect does not certify compliance with any of them.

Read this before the demo

What it does not do.

It is not a safeguarding case system.No concern records, no case notes, no child data. It carries the policy, the form and the record of who confirmed them.
It is not training.An acknowledgement confirms receipt. The induction and the briefing are the training.
It does not certify compliance.It produces the record you evidence with.
Plans

Where this use case lands.

Spark$4per user per monthfrom 5 seats · monthly or annual
  • Acknowledgement on any post
  • Frontline access codes
  • Required reading with due dates
  • Analytics for the last 7 days

One school or training provider that needs the record and nothing else.

Command$8per user per monthfrom 10 seats · monthly or annualEverything in Spark, plus
  • Pinned announcements
  • Coverage by department and campus
  • Anonymous pulse surveys
  • Analytics for the last 90 days

Two or more campuses, and a head who needs to see which one is behind.

HQ$15per user per monthfrom 25 seats · annualEverything in Command, plus
  • Approval before publishing
  • Evidence pack and audit log export
  • Executive dashboard, 365-day analytics

Accreditation visits, a governing body, an approval chain and an audit trail. The organisation on this page. Talk to us.

USD per user per month. Annual billing saves 20% on Spark and Command. Every limit is on the pricing page.

The organisation on this page

Acacia Schools Group

Western Cape, South Africa · 4 campuses, 190 staff, coaches and aftercare · HQ plan

A fictional organisation. Every name, number and screen on this page is invented to show how the product behaves.

Education sales kit: two-page PDFTwo pages, USD prices, the evidence lines with links.

Bring the policy nobody can prove was read.

Early access is by invitation. Tell us about your organisation and we will be in touch.

Same record, other situations